Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ultra V Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. The prosecution activity for this portfolio is currently limited to this single matter, reflecting a very specific point of contact within the office.
Ayaan A Alam is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 pending office action. This single action represents the entirety of the 1 pending office action currently active for Ultra V Co. Ltd. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner reflects a focused technical effort within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. This streamlined structure suggests that the company's immediate prosecution goals are tied to a single examiner's review.
For legal strategy, the focus on Ayaan A Alam as the sole examiner for the 1 pending action simplifies the current prosecution landscape. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the technical scope of the pending work is highly specialized. The company's current efforts are entirely dependent on the resolution of this one action. This lack of complexity in the current data indicates a singular administrative path forward.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALAM, AYAAN A | 1 | 38.4% | +35.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18432686 | METHOD FOR PREPARING FILLER COMPOSITION FOR MOLDING | ALAM, AYAAN A | 70d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1611 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18432686 | METHOD FOR PREPARING FILLER COMPOSITION FOR MOLDING | ALAM, AYAAN A | 1611 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 70d | Pending | Feb 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial