Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ultrasight Ltd. has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. CWERN, JONATHAN is the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action.
With only 1 pending office action, the company's current legal activity is limited to a single point of contact at the patent office. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner, CWERN, JONATHAN, means that the advancement of the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering portfolio is currently tied to the examination of this 1 busiest examiner pending matter. Practitioners must ensure that the response to the 1 pending office action is comprehensive, as there are no other active cases to provide alternative growth. Because the prosecution is confined to 1 distinct art unit, the strategy should be closely aligned with the specific standards of that unit. The role of CWERN, JONATHAN is pivotal, as this examiner holds the company's entire current pending workload. Resolving the 1 pending office action is the primary priority.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CWERN, JONATHAN | 1 | 51.0% | +33.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18556123 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GUIDING POSITIONING AND ORIENTING OF AN ULTRASOUND PROBE | CWERN, JONATHAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3797 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18556123 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GUIDING POSITIONING AND ORIENTING OF AN ULTRASOUND PROBE | CWERN, JONATHAN | 3797 | §103Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 19, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialUltrasight Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jonathan Cwern has the most, with 1 of Ultrasight Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
