Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Umos One Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This portfolio is concentrated, as these actions are distributed across only 1 distinct art units. The workload is split between 2 distinct examiners, indicating a narrow focus for the company's current patent prosecution efforts. Practitioners should note that the prosecution strategy is currently limited to a single art unit, suggesting a highly specialized set of filings.
BARAKAT, MOHAMED is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This individual is responsible for 1 pending office action, which is one of the 2 pending office actions for the company. Because the 2 pending office actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners, no single examiner holds all of the active cases. This distribution suggests that while the technology is focused within 1 distinct art units, the specific examiner assignments are diverse relative to the small volume of pending matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARAKAT, MOHAMED | 1 | 73.7% | +23.1% |
| MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A | 1 | 49.1% | +50.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18307897 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING INTERFACE FOR MANAGING A VEHICLE OPERATING CORPORATION AND INTERFACE FOR MANAGING DRIVER BELONGING TO VEHICLE OPERATING CORPORATION | MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A | 28d |
| 19196770 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING DRIVER INTERFACE | BARAKAT, MOHAMED | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18307897 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING INTERFACE FOR MANAGING A VEHICLE OPERATING CORPORATION AND INTERFACE FOR MANAGING DRIVER BELONGING TO VEHICLE OPERATING CORPORATION | MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A | 28d |
| 19196770 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING DRIVER INTERFACE | BARAKAT, MOHAMED | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19196770 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING DRIVER INTERFACE | BARAKAT, MOHAMED | — | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 02, 2025 |
| 18307897 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROVIDING INTERFACE FOR MANAGING A VEHICLE OPERATING CORPORATION AND INTERFACE FOR MANAGING DRIVER BELONGING TO VEHICLE OPERATING CORPORATION | MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A | 3628 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | Apr 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial