Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Uni-Splendor Corporation

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Uni-Splendor Corporation has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This 1 matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is being processed within 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of the current workload into 1 pending office action suggests a focused prosecution phase for the company in this specific technology sector.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MITCHUM, DREW JOSEPH, who is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the total number of pending office actions is 1, MITCHUM, DREW JOSEPH is the sole examiner responsible for the company's active applications. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit means that the company's current patenting efforts are not subject to the varied standards of different administrative groups. Success in this portfolio depends on addressing the specific requirements of this 1 distinct examiner and the 1 distinct art unit involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MITCHUM, DREW JOSEPH 1 50.0% +0.0%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3761 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18168365 Adjusting Device of Imitation Flame of Electric Fireplace MITCHUM, DREW JOSEPH 3761 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 13, 2023

Managing Uni-Splendor Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Uni-Splendor Corporation have?

Uni-Splendor Corporation has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Uni-Splendor Corporation applications?

Drew Joseph Mitchum has the most, with 1 of Uni-Splendor Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Uni-Splendor Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month