Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
UNI&FORMA d.o.o. is prosecuting a portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. There is 1 pending office action currently active. This single matter represents the current focus of the company's patent activities.
The portfolio's prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the technical scope of the filings is specialized and remains within a single administrative group at the USPTO. For the practitioner, this concentration eliminates the need to coordinate between different art units or manage multiple examiner styles.
DUCKWORTH, BRIANNA T is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because there is 1 pending office action in total, this examiner has sole oversight of the current active pipeline. The practitioner's strategy should be informed by the specific tendencies of this one official.
With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution process is highly centralized. The practitioner can manage the 1 pending office action with a clear understanding of the single examiner's expectations. This focused approach allows for a more efficient prosecution of the company's medical and mechanical innovations.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUCKWORTH, BRIANNA T | 1 | 44.8% | +47.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18003120 | PAIR OF TROUSERS COMPRISING A WAISTBAND SYSTEM | DUCKWORTH, BRIANNA T | 19d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3732 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18003120 | PAIR OF TROUSERS COMPRISING A WAISTBAND SYSTEM | DUCKWORTH, BRIANNA T | 3732 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 19d overdue | Pending | Dec 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial