Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Uniphy Limited currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, which indicates that each matter falls into a different technical classification within the broader communications field. The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, meaning that every pending action is being reviewed by a different individual at the patent office. This distribution across 2 distinct examiners for 2 pending office actions suggests that the company faces a variety of examination styles despite the small size of the portfolio.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SIDDIQUI, MD SAIFUL A, who is responsible for 1 of the 2 pending office actions. With 2 distinct examiners for 2 pending office actions, the workload is evenly spread among the assigned officials. This distribution suggests that the company prosecution outcomes are dependent on the individual tendencies of these 2 distinct examiners. Practitioners should note that the involvement of 2 distinct art units requires a strategy that accounts for different examination standards across the communications sector. Managing 2 pending office actions with 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units ensures that no single individual or group has an outsized impact on the overall portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHATLY, AMIT | 1 | 67.9% | +13.3% |
| SIDDIQUI, MD SAIFUL A | 1 | 79.5% | +15.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19472022 | OPTICAL SYSTEM AND DEVICES | CHATLY, AMIT | — |
| 19472009 | PACKAGED LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND TOUCH SENSITIVE APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME | SIDDIQUI, MD SAIFUL A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19472022 | OPTICAL SYSTEM AND DEVICES | CHATLY, AMIT | — |
| 19472009 | PACKAGED LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND TOUCH SENSITIVE APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME | SIDDIQUI, MD SAIFUL A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2624 | 1 |
| 2626 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19472022 | OPTICAL SYSTEM AND DEVICES | CHATLY, AMIT | 2624 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 07, 2025 |
| 19472009 | PACKAGED LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND TOUCH SENSITIVE APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME | SIDDIQUI, MD SAIFUL A | 2626 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial