Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
United Grinding Group AG manages a company patent portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area. There is 1 pending office action currently active. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which means the company's current patent office interactions are focused on a single point of review. Having 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner means the company's immediate patenting success relies on the specific review of 1 individual within the patent office.
The activity is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit. OLSHANNIKOV, ALEKSEY is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the company's current patent office interaction is limited to 1 point of contact. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests a specific technical focus within the Computing & Software field. The reliance on 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending office action means that the company can focus its resources on addressing the specific requirements and examination style of that individual. This focus within 1 distinct art unit simplifies the current prosecution landscape for the company's pending patent matter, allowing for a targeted strategy to address the 1 examiner's concerns.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLSHANNIKOV, ALEKSEY | 1 | 55.2% | +52.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18718419 | INTERACTIVE PROPOSAL SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A SET OF OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS FOR A MACHINE TOOL, CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A MACHINE TOOL, MACHINE TOOL AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SET OF OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS | OLSHANNIKOV, ALEKSEY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18718419 | INTERACTIVE PROPOSAL SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A SET OF OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS FOR A MACHINE TOOL, CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A MACHINE TOOL, MACHINE TOOL AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SET OF OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS | OLSHANNIKOV, ALEKSEY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2118 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18718419 | INTERACTIVE PROPOSAL SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A SET OF OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS FOR A MACHINE TOOL, CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A MACHINE TOOL, MACHINE TOOL AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A SET OF OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS | OLSHANNIKOV, ALEKSEY | 2118 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial