Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 182 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting only | 2 (67%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEROUX, ETIENNE PIERRE | 1 | 88.5% | +5.3% |
| MOORTHY, ARAVIND K | 1 | 84.4% | +12.2% |
| NGUYEN, TIEN C | 1 | 67.9% | +18.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19191980 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED PHONE AND DIGITAL COMMUNICATION VERIFICATION AND EFFICIENCY | MOORTHY, ARAVIND K | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19191980 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED PHONE AND DIGITAL COMMUNICATION VERIFICATION AND EFFICIENCY | MOORTHY, ARAVIND K | — |
| 19038702 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOBILE CHECK DEPOSIT ENABLING AUTO-CAPTURE FUNCTIONALITY VIA VIDEO FRAME PROCESSING | NGUYEN, TIEN C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2161 | 1 |
| 3694 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19201230 | NET SETTLEMENT OF SUBROGATION CLAIMS USING A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER | LEROUX, ETIENNE PIERRE | 2161 | — | Final Rejection | 22d | Pending | May 07, 2025 |
| 19191980 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED PHONE AND DIGITAL COMMUNICATION VERIFICATION AND EFFICIENCY | MOORTHY, ARAVIND K | — | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 28, 2025 |
| 19038702 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOBILE CHECK DEPOSIT ENABLING AUTO-CAPTURE FUNCTIONALITY VIA VIDEO FRAME PROCESSING | NGUYEN, TIEN C | 3694 | DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 27, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial