Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Universite De Montpellier currently manages 5 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, indicating a broad spread of examination across the USPTO. The lack of concentration suggests that prosecution strategies must be tailored to the specific preferences of multiple individual examiners rather than a single group.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SEAMAN, D MARGARET M, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because each of the 5 distinct examiners holds only a single action, the workload is perfectly balanced across the current docket. Practitioners should prepare for diverse procedural styles as no single examiner or art unit dominates the pending matters. This distribution across 5 distinct art units requires a flexible approach to address the varying standards within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector, as each case may follow a unique path toward allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (75%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SEAMAN, D MARGARET M 1 76.6% +8.1%
O DELL, DAVID K 1 57.7% +36.0%
LIU, CHU CHUAN 1 71.3% +14.9%
HOWELL, THEODORE R 1 66.9% +25.1%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18855427 LIPOPEPTIDE COMPOUND AND TREATMENT OF PAIN DISORDER O DELL, DAVID K —
18843732 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A PARAMETER OF THE RESPONSE OF AN AUDITORY NERVE OF A SUBJECT AND ASSOCIATED METHODS AND DEVICES LIU, CHU CHUAN —
18435619 COMPOUNDS FOR PREVENTING, INHIBITING, OR TREATING CANCER, AIDS AND/OR PREMATURE AGING HOWELL, THEODORE R —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18855427 LIPOPEPTIDE COMPOUND AND TREATMENT OF PAIN DISORDER O DELL, DAVID K —
18843732 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A PARAMETER OF THE RESPONSE OF AN AUDITORY NERVE OF A SUBJECT AND ASSOCIATED METHODS AND DEVICES LIU, CHU CHUAN —
18435619 COMPOUNDS FOR PREVENTING, INHIBITING, OR TREATING CANCER, AIDS AND/OR PREMATURE AGING HOWELL, THEODORE R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1625 1
1692 1
3791 1
1628 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18973608 IN VITRO OR EX VIVO METHODS FOR SCREENING A QUINOLINE DERIVATIVE SEAMAN, D MARGARET M 1625 §102DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 09, 2024
18855427 LIPOPEPTIDE COMPOUND AND TREATMENT OF PAIN DISORDER O DELL, DAVID K 1692 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 09, 2024
18843732 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A PARAMETER OF THE RESPONSE OF AN AUDITORY NERVE OF A SUBJECT AND ASSOCIATED METHODS AND DEVICES LIU, CHU CHUAN 3791 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 04, 2024
18435619 COMPOUNDS FOR PREVENTING, INHIBITING, OR TREATING CANCER, AIDS AND/OR PREMATURE AGING HOWELL, THEODORE R 1628 §101DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 07, 2024

Managing UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER have?

UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER applications?

D Margaret M Seaman has the most, with 1 of UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER's pending office actions.

What technology area are UNIVERSITE DE MONTPELLIER's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month