Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

UNIVERSITEIT UTRECHT HOLDING B.V.

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (25%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§102 only2 (50%)
No statute on record1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HIBBERT, CATHERINE S 1 59.2% +48.3%
RIETH, STEPHEN EDWARD 1 44.9% +32.6%
WOLF, MEGAN YARNALL 1 61.0% +39.9%
COUNTS, GARY W 1 58.9% +29.3%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18267693 CATH2 DERIVATIVES FOR STIMULATING INNATE IMMUNE MEMORY HIBBERT, CATHERINE S 58d overdue
18036924 SHRINKABLE HYDROGELS RIETH, STEPHEN EDWARD 9d overdue
18155299 Methods for Middle Down Antibody Characterization COUNTS, GARY W 7d
18245725 Stifle joint stabilizing meniscus prosthesis WOLF, MEGAN YARNALL 13d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1658 1
1759 1
3774 1
1678 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18267693 CATH2 DERIVATIVES FOR STIMULATING INNATE IMMUNE MEMORY HIBBERT, CATHERINE S 1658 Other Non-Final OA 58d overdue Pending Jun 15, 2023
18036924 SHRINKABLE HYDROGELS RIETH, STEPHEN EDWARD 1759 §102 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending May 15, 2023
18245725 Stifle joint stabilizing meniscus prosthesis WOLF, MEGAN YARNALL 3774 §102 Final Rejection 13d Pending Mar 17, 2023
18155299 Methods for Middle Down Antibody Characterization COUNTS, GARY W 1678 §103 Non-Final OA 7d Pending Jan 17, 2023

Managing UNIVERSITEIT UTRECHT HOLDING B.V.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month