Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single active case is being reviewed by a distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit, which points to a very specific and concentrated area of research and patenting. This concentration means the university's current prosecution success is tied to a single administrative path, allowing for a focused legal strategy.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL, who is managing the solitary pending office action. Because this is the only active matter, the university's immediate progress in the Chemistry & Materials field is entirely dependent on the feedback from DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL. Practitioners should analyze the specific tendencies of this examiner to effectively navigate the pending action. The involvement of only a single art unit suggests that the university's current patenting efforts are confined to a specific sub-discipline of chemistry. This narrow focus requires a precise technical argument to satisfy the examiner's requirements and secure the desired patent protection for the university's research.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL | 1 | 3.4% | +20.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18702604 | VEGETABLE SIDESTREAM VALORISATION | DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18702604 | VEGETABLE SIDESTREAM VALORISATION | DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1792 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18702604 | VEGETABLE SIDESTREAM VALORISATION | DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL | 1792 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 18, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial