Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO has 4 pending office actions within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These matters are distributed across 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units, showing a complete lack of concentration in the prosecution of these cases. Each of the 4 pending office actions is being handled by a different individual in a different administrative group.

The busiest examiner, ROBINSON, KYLE G, is responsible for 1 pending office action, which is consistent with the even distribution across the 4 distinct examiners. This 1 to 1 ratio of actions to examiners means that the university must manage four separate prosecution tracks simultaneously. The involvement of 4 distinct art units suggests that the 4 pending office actions cover a variety of sub-fields within Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals.

Practitioners should be prepared for four different sets of examiner expectations and art unit guidelines. This diversity in examiners and art units prevents any single official from having a disproportionate impact on the overall portfolio. However, it also means that there is no opportunity to consolidate arguments across multiple cases with the same examiner. The 4 pending office actions require a highly individualized approach for each matter within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
75% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ROBINSON, KYLE G 1 11.7% +16.6%
DICKINSON, PAUL W 1 63.2% +9.6%
KUCKLA, ANNA GRACE 1 53.8% +51.3%
JOHANSEN, PETER N. 1 59.6% +24.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19131342 ASSESSING HEALTH OF A HEART VALVE ROBINSON, KYLE G —
18033911 PHOSPHATE BASED TARGETS DICKINSON, PAUL W —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18002800 USES, METHODS AND PRODUCTS RELATING TO OLIGOMERIC LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE BINDING PROTEINS JOHANSEN, PETER N. 26d
19131342 ASSESSING HEALTH OF A HEART VALVE ROBINSON, KYLE G —
18247498 TREATMENT FOR VIRAL INFECTION KUCKLA, ANNA GRACE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3685 1
1618 1
1626 1
1644 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19131342 ASSESSING HEALTH OF A HEART VALVE ROBINSON, KYLE G 3685 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 20, 2025
18033911 PHOSPHATE BASED TARGETS DICKINSON, PAUL W 1618 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 26, 2023
18247498 TREATMENT FOR VIRAL INFECTION KUCKLA, ANNA GRACE 1626 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 31, 2023
18002800 USES, METHODS AND PRODUCTS RELATING TO OLIGOMERIC LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE BINDING PROTEINS JOHANSEN, PETER N. 1644 §112 Final Rejection 26d Pending Dec 21, 2022

Managing UNIVERSITETET I OSLO's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does UNIVERSITETET I OSLO have?

UNIVERSITETET I OSLO has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most UNIVERSITETET I OSLO applications?

Kyle G Robinson has the most, with 1 of UNIVERSITETET I OSLO's pending office actions.

What technology area are UNIVERSITETET I OSLO's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month