Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN manages a company patent portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. There are 5 pending office actions currently active, which are assigned to 5 distinct examiners. This distribution ensures that each pending matter is handled by a different individual, providing a variety of perspectives on the university's intellectual property. The involvement of 4 distinct art units suggests that the portfolio covers several specialized fields within the biotechnology sector, requiring a broad technical understanding from the legal team.

The busiest examiner, TRAN, CHRISTINA L, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since the total count of pending office actions is 5, the workload is spread thinly across the examining staff. This lack of concentration means that the university must manage 5 separate prosecution timelines and examiner relationships simultaneously. Practitioners should be prepared for a decentralized process where the results of one office action may not predict the outcomes of the others, as no single examiner holds a majority of the cases.

With 5 distinct examiners operating across 4 distinct art units, there is a concentration of activity within at least one art unit. This overlap requires a coordinated strategy to maintain consistency in technical arguments across the 4 distinct art units. The busiest examiner's load of 1 pending office action highlights the even distribution of the 5 total actions. This structure necessitates a comprehensive management approach to handle the diverse requirements of the different examiners and art units involved in the university's patent prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
1
Medium (20%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (40%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRAN, CHRISTINA L 1 51.6% +49.8%
KANG, TIMOTHY J 1 45.5% +27.0%
MINCHELLA, KAITLYN L 1 26.4% +21.7%
LIPPOLIS, ALEXANDRA ROSE 1 47.2% +63.6%
BAKSHI, PANCHAM 1 76.7% +30.2%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18687575 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY RECOMMENDING FOOTWEAR SIZE, AND FOOTWEAR THEREOF KANG, TIMOTHY J —
18564440 MOLECULAR EVALUATION METHODS MINCHELLA, KAITLYN L —
17763441 NANOPARTICLE COMPOSITIONS FOR GENE THERAPY LIPPOLIS, ALEXANDRA ROSE —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18701230 NUCLEIC ACID AGENTS FOR TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER TRAN, CHRISTINA L —
18687575 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY RECOMMENDING FOOTWEAR SIZE, AND FOOTWEAR THEREOF KANG, TIMOTHY J —
18564440 MOLECULAR EVALUATION METHODS MINCHELLA, KAITLYN L —
17763441 NANOPARTICLE COMPOSITIONS FOR GENE THERAPY LIPPOLIS, ALEXANDRA ROSE —
17763509 HYPERBRANCHED CATIONIC POLYMERS USEFUL AS NUCLEIC ACID DELIVERY VECTORS FOR TRANSFECTING CELLS BAKSHI, PANCHAM —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1637 2
3689 1
1685 1
1623 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18701230 NUCLEIC ACID AGENTS FOR TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER TRAN, CHRISTINA L 1637 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 14, 2024
18687575 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY RECOMMENDING FOOTWEAR SIZE, AND FOOTWEAR THEREOF KANG, TIMOTHY J 3689 §101§102 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 28, 2024
18564440 MOLECULAR EVALUATION METHODS MINCHELLA, KAITLYN L 1685 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 27, 2023
17763441 NANOPARTICLE COMPOSITIONS FOR GENE THERAPY LIPPOLIS, ALEXANDRA ROSE 1637 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 24, 2022
17763509 HYPERBRANCHED CATIONIC POLYMERS USEFUL AS NUCLEIC ACID DELIVERY VECTORS FOR TRANSFECTING CELLS BAKSHI, PANCHAM 1623 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 24, 2022

Managing UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN have?

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN applications?

Christina L Tran has the most, with 1 of UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN's pending office actions.

What technology area are UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month