Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN is currently managing 3 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, which indicates a lack of concentration in the prosecution process. Each examiner handles a single application, requiring the legal team to adapt to 3 different sets of examiner preferences and styles.

The 3 pending actions are further divided across 3 distinct art units. This distribution means that every pending action is being evaluated by a different technical group within the patent office. Practitioners must be prepared to address the specific examination standards of different administrative groups within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field.

HIRAKIS, SOPHIA P is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently holding 1 pending office action. Because the busiest examiner only manages 1 of the 3 total actions, there is no primary point of contact for the portfolio. Success in these 3 pending office actions will require a decentralized strategy that addresses the unique technical and procedural demands of each individual examiner and art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (33%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)
No statute on record1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCGRATH, ERIN E 1 60.3% +28.4%
PATEL, VISHAL I 1 78.5% +9.8%
HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD 1 36.3% +23.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18850158 AN ENDOVASCULAR OCCLUSION DEVICE MCGRATH, ERIN E —
17598497 CONFIGURATIONAL ENERGY CALCULATION AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE PREDICTION HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18850158 AN ENDOVASCULAR OCCLUSION DEVICE MCGRATH, ERIN E —
17598497 CONFIGURATIONAL ENERGY CALCULATION AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE PREDICTION HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 1
1700 1
1685 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18850158 AN ENDOVASCULAR OCCLUSION DEVICE MCGRATH, ERIN E 3771 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 24, 2024
18454569 SURFACE PREPARATION PATEL, VISHAL I 1700 Other Final Rejection — Pending Aug 23, 2023
17598497 CONFIGURATIONAL ENERGY CALCULATION AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE PREDICTION HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD 1685 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 27, 2021

Managing UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN have?

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN applications?

Erin E Mcgrath has the most, with 1 of UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN's pending office actions.

What technology area are UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month