Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

University of Copenhagen

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

11 pending office actions • 9 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The University of Copenhagen has 11 pending office actions focused in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are handled by 11 distinct examiners across 10 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio between the 11 pending actions and 11 distinct examiners indicates that every active matter is being reviewed by a different individual, preventing any single examiner from having a disproportionate impact on the portfolio.

The busiest examiner, SAIDHA, TEKCHAND, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This matches the workload of every other examiner involved, as the 11 pending office actions are spread perfectly across 11 distinct examiners. Navigating 10 distinct art units requires the university to address a variety of technical requirements and examination styles within the pharmaceutical field.

With 11 pending office actions currently in progress, the university maintains a broad front of intellectual property development. The involvement of 10 distinct art units suggests that the underlying technologies are diverse enough to fall under multiple specialized classifications. Practitioners must account for the perspectives of 11 different examiners to successfully advance these 11 pending actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

7
Hard (64%)
2
Medium (18%)
1
Easy (9%)
1
Unknown (9%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (18%)
§103 only1 (9%)
§102 only1 (9%)
§112 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (45%)
No statute on record1 (9%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

10
Life Sciences
91% of docket
1
Information Tech
9% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BARRON, SEAN C 1 52.7% +30.4%
SAIDHA, TEKCHAND 1 82.9% +14.0%
BARRETT, RYAN S 1 65.6% +40.9%
BOWERS, ERIN M 1 54.7% +9.8%
STEELE, AMBER D 1 58.9% +9.3%
TRAN, KHOA NHAT 1 41.9% +50.5%
SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H 1 41.8% +38.7%
SHOMER, ISAAC 1 63.1% +30.5%
KWON, JOHN SEUNGJAI 1 44.9% +20.2%
BEANE, RANDALL L 1 32.9% +36.2%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18762269 GENERATION OF GLUCOSE-RESPONSIVE BETA CELLS BARRON, SEAN C 6d
18041827 EXTRACORPOREAL CLEARING TRAPS BASED ON INVERSE ELECTRON DEMAND DIELS-ALDER CYCLOADDITION FOR (PRE)-TARGETED THERAPY AND DIAGNOSTICS SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H 39d
18566290 PEPTIDES WITH MUCIN-BINDING PROPERTIES BOWERS, ERIN M 70d
18721990 IMPROVED HEPARAN SULFATE AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME SAIDHA, TEKCHAND —
18564398 PEPTIDES DERIVED FROM RUMINOCOCCUS TORQUES STEELE, AMBER D —
18038044 CRISPR/CAS SCREENING SYSTEM MATERIALS AND METHODS TRAN, KHOA NHAT —
17768525 Agonist of Tacr2 BEANE, RANDALL L —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18762269 GENERATION OF GLUCOSE-RESPONSIVE BETA CELLS BARRON, SEAN C 6d
18041827 EXTRACORPOREAL CLEARING TRAPS BASED ON INVERSE ELECTRON DEMAND DIELS-ALDER CYCLOADDITION FOR (PRE)-TARGETED THERAPY AND DIAGNOSTICS SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H 39d
18721990 IMPROVED HEPARAN SULFATE AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME SAIDHA, TEKCHAND —
18683341 A METHOD OF MANIPULATING A QUBIT AND AN ASSEMBLY COMPRISING A QUBIT BARRETT, RYAN S —
18038044 CRISPR/CAS SCREENING SYSTEM MATERIALS AND METHODS TRAN, KHOA NHAT —
18166339 CO-AMORPHOUS FORM OF A SUBSTANCE AND A PROTEIN SHOMER, ISAAC —
17907455 A FLEXIBLE FOIL FOR THE DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC CARGOS KWON, JOHN SEUNGJAI —
17768525 Agonist of Tacr2 BEANE, RANDALL L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1653 2
1654 2
1652 1
2148 1
1658 1
1632 1
1618 1
1612 1
1615 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18762269 GENERATION OF GLUCOSE-RESPONSIVE BETA CELLS BARRON, SEAN C 1653 §102§112Other Final Rejection 6d Pending Jul 02, 2024
18721990 IMPROVED HEPARAN SULFATE AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME SAIDHA, TEKCHAND 1652 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2024
18683341 A METHOD OF MANIPULATING A QUBIT AND AN ASSEMBLY COMPRISING A QUBIT BARRETT, RYAN S 2148 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 13, 2024
18566290 PEPTIDES WITH MUCIN-BINDING PROPERTIES BOWERS, ERIN M 1653 §102§112 Final Rejection 70d Pending Dec 01, 2023
18564398 PEPTIDES DERIVED FROM RUMINOCOCCUS TORQUES STEELE, AMBER D 1658 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 27, 2023
18038044 CRISPR/CAS SCREENING SYSTEM MATERIALS AND METHODS TRAN, KHOA NHAT 1632 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 22, 2023
18041827 EXTRACORPOREAL CLEARING TRAPS BASED ON INVERSE ELECTRON DEMAND DIELS-ALDER CYCLOADDITION FOR (PRE)-TARGETED THERAPY AND DIAGNOSTICS SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H 1618 §103§112 Non-Final OA 39d Pending Feb 16, 2023
18166339 CO-AMORPHOUS FORM OF A SUBSTANCE AND A PROTEIN SHOMER, ISAAC 1612 Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 08, 2023
17907455 A FLEXIBLE FOIL FOR THE DELIVERY OF THERAPEUTIC CARGOS KWON, JOHN SEUNGJAI 1615 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 27, 2022
17768525 Agonist of Tacr2 BEANE, RANDALL L 1654 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 13, 2022
17188805 GIP PEPTIDE ANALOGUES DABKOWSKI, ERINNE R 1654 §112Other Final Rejection 29d Pending Mar 01, 2021

Managing University of Copenhagen's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does University of Copenhagen have?

University of Copenhagen has 11 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 9 art units and 11 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most University of Copenhagen applications?

Sean C Barron has the most, with 1 of University of Copenhagen's pending office actions.

What technology area are University of Copenhagen's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month