Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER has 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. TOOHEY, RICHARD ORLANDO is the busiest examiner for the university, holding 1 pending office action. The portfolio current activity is split between 2 different examiners and 2 different art units.

This means each of the 2 pending office actions is being handled independently in a separate specialized group at the USPTO. Since the busiest examiner, TOOHEY, RICHARD ORLANDO, only has 1 action, there is no concentration of workload. The prosecution strategy must account for the unique requirements of 2 different art units and the individual styles of 2 different examiners in the semiconductors and optics field. Practitioners must manage 2 separate relationships and sets of examiner preferences across the 2 distinct art units.

The lack of concentration under TOOHEY, RICHARD ORLANDO means that no single examiner habits will dictate the outcome of the entire portfolio. Strategy should be focused on the individual requirements of each art unit within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area. The 2 pending office actions represent a set of challenges across the USPTO. Each application requires a unique approach tailored to the specific examiner and the technical standards of their respective art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TOOHEY, RICHARD ORLANDO 1 81.9% +11.8%
CHEN, PATRICK C 1 82.5% +9.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18866870 LINEAR ACCELERATOR SYSTEM CHEN, PATRICK C 33d
19114879 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING ATTRIBUTES OF A SOURCE OF RADIATION TOOHEY, RICHARD ORLANDO —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19114879 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING ATTRIBUTES OF A SOURCE OF RADIATION TOOHEY, RICHARD ORLANDO —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2884 1
2842 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19114879 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING ATTRIBUTES OF A SOURCE OF RADIATION TOOHEY, RICHARD ORLANDO 2884 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 25, 2025
18866870 LINEAR ACCELERATOR SYSTEM CHEN, PATRICK C 2842 §103§112 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Nov 18, 2024

Managing UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER have?

UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER applications?

Richard Orlando Toohey has the most, with 1 of UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER's pending office actions.

What technology area are UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month