Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

University of Leeds

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

University of Leeds has 6 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. Each action is associated with a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit, so the portfolio has no repeated examiner or art-unit assignment in the available data.

JACOB, OOMMEN is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending action. Prosecution planning should therefore emphasize matter-specific technical records and consistent institutional review rather than a concentrated examiner strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (80%)
1
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
60% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JACOB, OOMMEN 1 79.2% +17.3%
FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL 1 18.9% +22.9%
LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE 1 64.4% +43.2%
AEDER, SEAN E 1 56.9% +20.0%
BYRNES, DAVID R 1 78.2% +20.9%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19167566 Device and System for Non-Invasively Determining a Concentration of an Analyte JACOB, OOMMEN —
19116966 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING VIRTUAL POPULATIONS OF ANATOMY FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL —
18278366 IDENTIFICATION OF GENOMIC TARGETS LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE —
17765596 PLANTS HAVING A MODIFIED LAZY PROTEIN BYRNES, DAVID R —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19167566 Device and System for Non-Invasively Determining a Concentration of an Analyte JACOB, OOMMEN —
19116966 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING VIRTUAL POPULATIONS OF ANATOMY FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL —
18278366 IDENTIFICATION OF GENOMIC TARGETS LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE —
18186765 PREDICTION OF RESPONSE TO EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR-DIRECTED THERAPIES USING EPIREGULIN AND AMPHIREGULIN AEDER, SEAN E —
17765596 PLANTS HAVING A MODIFIED LAZY PROTEIN BYRNES, DAVID R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3797 1
3687 1
1684 1
1642 1
1662 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19167566 Device and System for Non-Invasively Determining a Concentration of an Analyte JACOB, OOMMEN 3797 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 22, 2025
19116966 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING VIRTUAL POPULATIONS OF ANATOMY FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL 3687 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2025
18278366 IDENTIFICATION OF GENOMIC TARGETS LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE 1684 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 22, 2023
18186765 PREDICTION OF RESPONSE TO EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR-DIRECTED THERAPIES USING EPIREGULIN AND AMPHIREGULIN AEDER, SEAN E 1642 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 20, 2023
17765596 PLANTS HAVING A MODIFIED LAZY PROTEIN BYRNES, DAVID R 1662 §102§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 31, 2022

Managing University of Leeds's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does University of Leeds have?

University of Leeds has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most University of Leeds applications?

Oommen Jacob has the most, with 1 of University of Leeds's pending office actions.

What technology area are University of Leeds's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month