Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

The UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This matter is located within a distinct art unit, reflecting a focused technical scope for the institution's current patent activity. The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the communication and negotiation process between the applicant and the patent office. This focused approach is typical for portfolios with limited active filings, where the goal is to resolve the outstanding matter efficiently through a single point of contact.

The busiest examiner, COPPINS, JANET L, is responsible for the pending office action. Since this is the only pending action in the portfolio, the examiner's individual review will determine the immediate path forward for the medical center's intellectual property. This single-examiner environment simplifies the prosecution strategy by removing the need to reconcile different examiner viewpoints or art unit practices. Practitioners should prioritize a clear and direct dialogue with COPPINS, JANET L to address any technical rejections or prior art concerns raised in the 1 distinct art unit.

The presence of a distinct art unit in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field indicates that the technology is being evaluated by a specific group of experts. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the practitioner can focus exclusively on the concerns of the assigned examiner. This concentrated effort is beneficial for ensuring a thorough and effective response to the patent office's requirements. Success in this matter will secure the institution's position in the life sciences sector and provide a foundation for future research commercialization.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COPPINS, JANET L 1 72.6% +26.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18464725 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR REVERSING AGE-ASSOCIATED DENDRITIC SPINE LOSS COPPINS, JANET L 34d

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18464725 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR REVERSING AGE-ASSOCIATED DENDRITIC SPINE LOSS COPPINS, JANET L 34d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1628 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18464725 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR REVERSING AGE-ASSOCIATED DENDRITIC SPINE LOSS COPPINS, JANET L 1628 §103§112 Final Rejection 34d Pending Sep 11, 2023

Managing UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month