Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

University of Utah

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The University of Utah is managing 3 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct art units, reflecting a variety of specialized technical focuses within their biotech portfolio. There are 3 distinct examiners assigned to these cases, with each examiner handling a single action. This distribution across three separate art units suggests a decentralized prosecution process for the university's current applications.

STOCKTON, LAURA LYNNE is identified as the busiest examiner, currently holding 1 pending action. Because the 3 pending office actions are spread among 3 distinct examiners, the prosecution strategy must be adapted to three different sets of examiner expectations. The involvement of 3 distinct art units further indicates that the university's research spans multiple biological or pharmaceutical disciplines. Practitioners must coordinate their efforts across these different divisions, as there is no concentration of cases under STOCKTON, LAURA LYNNE or any other official. This profile shows a balanced distribution of active matters, where each of the 3 actions is subject to an independent review by a different examiner in a different art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STOCKTON, LAURA LYNNE 1 75.3% +33.7%
STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE 1 75.0% +50.0%
WOITACH, JOSEPH T 1 49.5% +27.4%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17520037 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENOME ANALYSIS WOITACH, JOSEPH T —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18397180 VACCINATION AGAINST FUNGAL EPITOPES TO PREVENT INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE 2d overdue
18725391 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS STOCKTON, LAURA LYNNE —
17520037 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENOME ANALYSIS WOITACH, JOSEPH T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1626 1
1645 1
1687 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18725391 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS STOCKTON, LAURA LYNNE 1626 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2024
18397180 VACCINATION AGAINST FUNGAL EPITOPES TO PREVENT INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE 1645 §103§112DP Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Dec 27, 2023
17520037 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENOME ANALYSIS WOITACH, JOSEPH T 1687 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 05, 2021

Managing University of Utah's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does University of Utah have?

University of Utah has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most University of Utah applications?

Laura Lynne Stockton has the most, with 1 of University of Utah's pending office actions.

What technology area are University of Utah's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month