Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

University of Utah

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The University of Utah is actively prosecuting matters within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio currently includes 2 pending office actions, which are distributed among 2 distinct examiners. This distribution indicates that each examiner is handling a separate matter, as the busiest examiner, STOCKTON, LAURA LYNNE, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This arrangement requires the university to manage different examiner relationships simultaneously.

Despite having 2 distinct examiners, the portfolio is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that while the individual examiners differ, the subject matter of the pending office actions remains within a closely related technical field. The presence of the 2 pending office actions across 1 distinct art unit implies a consistent technical focus for the university's current biotechnology filings, allowing for some synergy in the prosecution strategy.

For the practitioner, the involvement of the distinct examiners means that responses must be tailored to different individuals, even though they operate within the same art unit. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that no single examiner dominates the current workload. This balanced distribution requires monitoring separate prosecution timelines for the matters to ensure all deadlines are met within the 1 distinct art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§102 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STOCKTON, LAURA LYNNE 1 75.2% +33.7%
STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE 1 85.7% +33.3%
WOITACH, JOSEPH T 1 49.9% +28.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18397180 VACCINATION AGAINST FUNGAL EPITOPES TO PREVENT INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE 2d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17520037 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENOME ANALYSIS WOITACH, JOSEPH T —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18397180 VACCINATION AGAINST FUNGAL EPITOPES TO PREVENT INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE 2d overdue
18725391 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS STOCKTON, LAURA LYNNE —
17520037 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENOME ANALYSIS WOITACH, JOSEPH T —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1645 1
1631 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18725391 ANTIMICROBIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS STOCKTON, LAURA LYNNE — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2024
18397180 VACCINATION AGAINST FUNGAL EPITOPES TO PREVENT INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES STEPHENS, AMELIA CAROLE 1645 §102Other Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Dec 27, 2023
17520037 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENOME ANALYSIS WOITACH, JOSEPH T 1631 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 05, 2021

Managing University of Utah's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month