Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

UNIVERSITY PUBLIC CORPORATION OSAKA

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

UNIVERSITY PUBLIC CORPORATION OSAKA currently has 4 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These active matters are distributed among 4 distinct examiners, which indicates a broad engagement with the USPTO's technical staff. The portfolio also spans 3 distinct art units, suggesting that the university's research and patenting efforts cover several different specialized areas within the chemical sciences. This variety requires a prosecution strategy that can handle the nuances of different art unit standards and procedural expectations across multiple technical divisions.

The busiest examiner for UNIVERSITY PUBLIC CORPORATION OSAKA is WALLENHORST, MAUREEN, who is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. With 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, the workload is evenly distributed, meaning each examiner is responsible for a single matter. This distribution across 4 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units reduces the impact of any single examiner's subjective preferences on the overall portfolio. It also highlights the complexity of the university's current filings, which necessitate interaction with multiple specialized reviewers. Practitioners must manage four separate prosecution timelines for these 4 pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WALLENHORST, MAUREEN 1 78.9% +5.8%
SCHWARZENBERG, PAUL 1 61.6% +27.8%
KIM, TAE JUN 1 64.0% +25.7%
HUYNH, PHUONG N 1 65.7% +53.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18279643 WELDING ELECTRODE AND SPOT-WELDING DEVICE KIM, TAE JUN 15d overdue
18280804 CALCULATION METHOD FOR HEATING PLAN, PROGRAM, RECORDING MEDIUM, DEVICE, DEFORMATION METHOD, PLATE DEFORMATION DEVICE, AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR DEFORMED PLATE SCHWARZENBERG, PAUL —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18279643 WELDING ELECTRODE AND SPOT-WELDING DEVICE KIM, TAE JUN 15d overdue
17907659 MULTISPECIFIC ANTIBODY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME HUYNH, PHUONG N 19d
18280804 CALCULATION METHOD FOR HEATING PLAN, PROGRAM, RECORDING MEDIUM, DEVICE, DEFORMATION METHOD, PLATE DEFORMATION DEVICE, AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR DEFORMED PLATE SCHWARZENBERG, PAUL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1797 1
3799 1
1641 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18289837 Method for Detecting Analyte, Detection Kit and Detection System, and Method for Manufacturing Detection Kit WALLENHORST, MAUREEN 1797 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 07, 2023
18280804 CALCULATION METHOD FOR HEATING PLAN, PROGRAM, RECORDING MEDIUM, DEVICE, DEFORMATION METHOD, PLATE DEFORMATION DEVICE, AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR DEFORMED PLATE SCHWARZENBERG, PAUL — §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 07, 2023
18279643 WELDING ELECTRODE AND SPOT-WELDING DEVICE KIM, TAE JUN 3799 §103§112 Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending Aug 31, 2023
17907659 MULTISPECIFIC ANTIBODY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME HUYNH, PHUONG N 1641 §112 Final Rejection 19d Pending Sep 28, 2022

Managing UNIVERSITY PUBLIC CORPORATION OSAKA's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month