Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Université De Lorraine has 2 pending office actions in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics. The matters involve 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, so the portfolio has separate examination paths.
LABAZE, EDWYN is the busiest examiner with 1 pending matter. Counsel should maintain matter-specific responses while comparing technical terminology and claim framing across the semiconductor and optics applications.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LABAZE, EDWYN | 1 | 89.4% | +9.4% |
| ROBERTS, LEZAH | 1 | 48.6% | +35.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18833144 | ANTI-COUNTERFEITING OBJECT, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND USE THEREOF | LABAZE, EDWYN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18294739 | MUCOADHESIVE OCULAR DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF GLAUCOMA | ROBERTS, LEZAH | 46d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2876 | 1 |
| 1612 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18833144 | ANTI-COUNTERFEITING OBJECT, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND USE THEREOF | LABAZE, EDWYN | 2876 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 25, 2024 |
| 18294739 | MUCOADHESIVE OCULAR DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF GLAUCOMA | ROBERTS, LEZAH | 1612 | §103Other | Final Rejection | 46d | Pending | Feb 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialUniversité De Lorraine has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Edwyn Labaze has the most, with 1 of Université De Lorraine's pending office actions.
Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
