Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Updoc Inc.

2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Updoc Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions. Both of these matters are assigned to 1 distinct examiner, creating a centralized point of contact for the company's current patent prosecution. AURELIE H TU is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing the 2 pending office actions.

The data shows 0 distinct art units associated with these filings. Because 1 distinct examiner is handling the 2 pending office actions, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the review of the assigned individual. This concentration simplifies the communication process but increases the impact of the examiner's specific preferences across the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
2
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting only2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TU, AURELIE H 2 56.4% +60.0%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19044435 VOICE-BASED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES TU, AURELIE H —
19044423 VOICE-BASED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES TU, AURELIE H —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19044435 VOICE-BASED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES TU, AURELIE H — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 03, 2025
19044423 VOICE-BASED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGEMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES TU, AURELIE H — DP Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 03, 2025

Managing Updoc Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month