Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
UPL Corporation Limited currently has 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This 1 pending office action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH OLSEN. The matter is situated within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a singular administrative and technical classification for the company's current filing.
KAELEIGH ELIZABETH OLSEN is the busiest examiner for this entity, currently managing 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution of this biotechnological technology is highly centralized. The outcome of the 1 pending office action depends entirely on the interactions between the applicant and this single examiner within the designated art unit.
Practitioners should note that the lack of multiple pending actions prevents any comparison of examiner behavior or art unit standards within this portfolio. The prosecution strategy is focused on the 1 pending office action handled by KAELEIGH ELIZABETH OLSEN. This concentration means that the company's current presence in the biotechnology patent landscape is defined by this single active matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH | 1 | 47.1% | +64.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18028661 | COMBINATIONS OF CHLOROACETANILIDE HERBICIDES WITH SAFENERS | OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18028661 | COMBINATIONS OF CHLOROACETANILIDE HERBICIDES WITH SAFENERS | OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1619 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18028661 | COMBINATIONS OF CHLOROACETANILIDE HERBICIDES WITH SAFENERS | OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH | 1619 | §102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialUPL Corporation Limited has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Kaeleigh Elizabeth Olsen has the most, with 1 of UPL Corporation Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
