Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Urisan GmbH operates within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area, where it currently has 1 pending office action. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the company's current prosecution efforts. The focus on 1 matter indicates a streamlined but limited engagement with the patent office at this time.
The portfolio's activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit, aligning with the specialized nature of the medical and mechanical engineering field. This suggests that the company's current intellectual property efforts are highly targeted within 1 technical niche. The use of 1 art unit may provide a consistent framework for the legal standards applied to the application.
PHAM, KATHERINE-PH MINH is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. As this examiner is the only 1 currently assigned to a pending matter, their individual examination history and tendencies will be the determining factor for the company's immediate prosecution outcome. The busiest examiner pending count is 1, confirming that the entire current workload rests with this official.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHAM, KATHERINE-PH MINH | 1 | 59.0% | +50.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18868418 | SYSTEM FOR APPLYING A URINAL CONDOM | PHAM, KATHERINE-PH MINH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18868418 | SYSTEM FOR APPLYING A URINAL CONDOM | PHAM, KATHERINE-PH MINH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3781 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18868418 | SYSTEM FOR APPLYING A URINAL CONDOM | PHAM, KATHERINE-PH MINH | 3781 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial