Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Uv Cast Spolka Z Ograniczona Odpowiedzalnoscia has 1 pending office action currently active. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, while the portfolio currently lists 0 distinct art units. The concentration of the portfolio under a single examiner suggests a very specific or limited scope of active prosecution. CHOI, PETER Y is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 pending office action. This represents the total active workload for the company's patent filings at this time.
The absence of a recorded technology area and 0 art units for the pending action indicates a unique administrative status or a highly specialized filing. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of the single examiner involved. With only a single pending action, the company's immediate patenting goals are tied to a single examination outcome. This centralized structure simplifies the management of the portfolio but increases the impact of the individual examiner's decisions. The lack of additional active matters means there are no alternative prosecution tracks or comparative data points available within the current portfolio, making the relationship with this specific examiner the primary factor in the company's intellectual property outcomes.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOI, PETER Y | 1 | 20.6% | +33.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18865666 | CURABLE IMMOBILIZING CAST DRESSING | CHOI, PETER Y | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18865666 | CURABLE IMMOBILIZING CAST DRESSING | CHOI, PETER Y | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18865666 | CURABLE IMMOBILIZING CAST DRESSING | CHOI, PETER Y | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial