Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Uvi Indoor Ltd. holds a company patent portfolio that currently features a pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES. The data indicates that there are 0 distinct art units associated with this portfolio's current activity, which suggests a specific administrative status for the pending matter at the patent office.
The busiest examiner, PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. As this is the only pending office action in the entire portfolio, the examiner's individual review will be the determining factor for the company's current prosecution success. This concentration of the workload under a single official allows for a very focused legal strategy.
Practitioners should note that the absence of multiple examiners or art units simplifies the management of this portfolio. With only the pending office action to address, the company can devote its full attention to the specific concerns raised by the assigned examiner. The singular nature of the current workload highlights the importance of PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES in the company's intellectual property development.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES | 1 | 47.6% | +49.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18712004 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UV BASED MICROORGANISM INACTIVATION | PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18712004 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UV BASED MICROORGANISM INACTIVATION | PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18712004 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UV BASED MICROORGANISM INACTIVATION | PILSBURY, BRADY CHARLES | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial