Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MILLER, JOHN W | 1 | 44.1% | +0.5% |
| THIRUGNANAM, GANDHI | 1 | 73.5% | +12.7% |
| CESE, KENNY A | 1 | 75.2% | +11.0% |
| MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA | 1 | 71.8% | +30.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18940284 | CLOUD COMPUTING FLEXIBLE LARGE AREA MOSAIC ENGINE | THIRUGNANAM, GANDHI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18940284 | CLOUD COMPUTING FLEXIBLE LARGE AREA MOSAIC ENGINE | THIRUGNANAM, GANDHI | — |
| 18738698 | SITE SELECTION AND MONITORING | CESE, KENNY A | — |
| 18737594 | Ground Control Point Height Adjustment for Improved Ortho Accuracy | MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2422 | 1 |
| 2663 | 1 |
| 3648 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19007309 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR USE IN COMPUTER VISION FOR SHADOW MITIGATION | MILLER, JOHN W | 2422 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 31, 2024 |
| 18940284 | CLOUD COMPUTING FLEXIBLE LARGE AREA MOSAIC ENGINE | THIRUGNANAM, GANDHI | — | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 07, 2024 |
| 18738698 | SITE SELECTION AND MONITORING | CESE, KENNY A | 2663 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 10, 2024 |
| 18737594 | Ground Control Point Height Adjustment for Improved Ortho Accuracy | MAKHDOOM, SAMARINA | 3648 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial