Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Varjo Technologies Oy

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 41 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Varjo Technologies Oy is currently managing 4 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These actions are distributed across 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units, reflecting the range of technical oversight. CHANG, AUDREY Y is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for 1 pending action.

The distribution of 4 pending office actions among the distinct examiners suggests that the company must navigate multiple examination styles simultaneously. Because the prosecution involves 4 distinct art units, the Communications innovations likely span several specialized sub-sectors. This variety requires a broad legal strategy to address the different technical standards and examiner expectations present in each unit.

For a patent practitioner, this decentralized structure means that the outcome of a case may not necessarily predict the outcome of others. The company's presence in the distinct art units indicates a wide-reaching intellectual property strategy within the Communications field. Managing the examiners requires careful coordination to maintain consistency across the portfolio while responding to individual examiner feedback.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
20% of docket
3
Communications
60% of docket
1
Semiconductors
20% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CALDERON, CYNTHIA 1 77.2% +18.0%
CHANG, AUDREY Y 1 46.5% +20.4%
MOTSINGER, SEAN T 1 78.5% +11.9%
AYNALEM, NATHNAEL B 1 76.4% +12.9%
GEBRESLASSIE, WINTA 1 77.1% +23.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18953449 OPTICAL ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD OF REDUCING REFLECTIONS IN CAMERA, AND CAMERA CHANG, AUDREY Y —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18596786 OBJECT TRACKING FOR EXTENDED REALITY (XR) APPLICATIONS MOTSINGER, SEAN T 43d overdue
17991576 DETERMINING POINT SPREAD FUNCTION FROM CONSECUTIVE IMAGES GEBRESLASSIE, WINTA 8d overdue
18513590 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FOVEATING VIDEO STREAM AYNALEM, NATHNAEL B 28d
19073400 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MULTI-EXPOSURE HDR IMAGING INCORPORATING HALLUCINATION TECHNIQUE CALDERON, CYNTHIA —
18953449 OPTICAL ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD OF REDUCING REFLECTIONS IN CAMERA, AND CAMERA CHANG, AUDREY Y —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2639 1
2872 1
2673 1
2488 1
2677 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19073400 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MULTI-EXPOSURE HDR IMAGING INCORPORATING HALLUCINATION TECHNIQUE CALDERON, CYNTHIA 2639 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2025
18953449 OPTICAL ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD OF REDUCING REFLECTIONS IN CAMERA, AND CAMERA CHANG, AUDREY Y 2872 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 20, 2024
18596786 OBJECT TRACKING FOR EXTENDED REALITY (XR) APPLICATIONS MOTSINGER, SEAN T 2673 §103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Mar 06, 2024
18513590 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FOVEATING VIDEO STREAM AYNALEM, NATHNAEL B 2488 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Nov 19, 2023
17991576 DETERMINING POINT SPREAD FUNCTION FROM CONSECUTIVE IMAGES GEBRESLASSIE, WINTA 2677 §103 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Nov 21, 2022

Managing Varjo Technologies Oy's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month