Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Veero Analytics LLC

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Veero Analytics LLC has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused technical scope for the current portfolio. The prosecution is being reviewed by a distinct examiner, ensuring that the matter receives dedicated attention. This centralized structure suggests that the company is prioritizing a specific technical advancement within its communications portfolio.

KUDO, KEN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing the pending office action. With only a specific examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is highly focused. This allows for a targeted response to the 1 pending office action within the Communications sector. Practitioners should leverage this concentrated profile to build a consistent and persuasive record with the assigned examiner. Maintaining a clear dialogue with the personnel in this specific art unit is essential for navigating the current prosecution landscape.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KUDO, KEN 1 — —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18607841 Monocular Camera-Assisted Technique with Glasses Accommodation for Precise Facial Feature Measurements at Varying Distances KUDO, KEN 23d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2671 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18607841 Monocular Camera-Assisted Technique with Glasses Accommodation for Precise Facial Feature Measurements at Varying Distances KUDO, KEN 2671 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 23d overdue Pending Mar 18, 2024

Managing Veero Analytics LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month