Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 3 of 5 (60%) have an AI response strategy ready • 32 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (60%) |
| §102 only | 1 (20%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COUSINS, JOSEPH M | 1 | 62.7% | +21.8% |
| EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 1 | 10.0% | +29.9% |
| AUGUSTINE, NICHOLAS | 1 | 73.2% | +27.9% |
| SHAH, VAISHALI | 1 | 57.1% | +56.8% |
| LE, MICHAEL | 1 | 65.9% | +22.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18642815 | System and Method for managing patient appointments | EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 23d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18642815 | System and Method for managing patient appointments | EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 23d overdue |
| 18220619 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DATA RECONCILIATION AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION | LE, MICHAEL | 16d overdue |
| 18789218 | ADAPTIVE METHODS FOR ROUTING DATA IN A SECURE STORAGE NETWORK | COUSINS, JOSEPH M | 11d overdue |
| 18601827 | Computing Networks and Systems for Tracking Data | SHAH, VAISHALI | 20d |
| 18606049 | Systems and Methods for Linguistically-Selective Web Form Generation | AUGUSTINE, NICHOLAS | 21d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2459 | 1 |
| 3687 | 1 |
| 2178 | 1 |
| 2156 | 1 |
| 2163 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18789218 | ADAPTIVE METHODS FOR ROUTING DATA IN A SECURE STORAGE NETWORK | COUSINS, JOSEPH M | 2459 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 11d overdue | AI Ready | Jul 30, 2024 |
| 18642815 | System and Method for managing patient appointments | EVANS, ASHLEY ELIZABETH | 3687 | §103 | Final Rejection | 23d overdue | Pending | Apr 22, 2024 |
| 18606049 | Systems and Methods for Linguistically-Selective Web Form Generation | AUGUSTINE, NICHOLAS | 2178 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 21d | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
| 18601827 | Computing Networks and Systems for Tracking Data | SHAH, VAISHALI | 2156 | §103 | Final Rejection | 20d | AI Ready | Mar 11, 2024 |
| 18220619 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DATA RECONCILIATION AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION | LE, MICHAEL | 2163 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 16d overdue | AI Ready | Jul 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial