Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Vendex Solutions Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is handling one case. The portfolio spans 2 distinct art units. This decentralized structure ensures that each of the 2 pending office actions is evaluated independently by a different examiner in a different technical unit.
The busiest examiner is CHEIN, ALLEN C, who has 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units for 2 pending office actions, the company's current prosecution is fully decentralized. This suggests that the 2 pending office actions relate to different technical specialties within the transportation and e-commerce fields. By having 2 distinct examiners, Vendex Solutions Inc. gains two separate perspectives on its 2 pending office actions, reducing the impact of any single examiner's interpretation across the 2 distinct art units. This strategy is effective for a company whose 2 pending office actions cover diverse innovations within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (50%) |
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHEIN, ALLEN C | 1 | 45.1% | +40.0% |
| ALI, JAHED | 1 | 61.9% | +53.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19045444 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UNIFORM USAGE RIGHTS MANAGEMENT | ALI, JAHED | 15d overdue |
| 19193163 | MULTI-ENTITY PLATFORM USING UNIFORM LABELING OF DATA PRODUCTS AND SERVICES | CHEIN, ALLEN C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19045444 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UNIFORM USAGE RIGHTS MANAGEMENT | ALI, JAHED | 15d overdue |
| 19193163 | MULTI-ENTITY PLATFORM USING UNIFORM LABELING OF DATA PRODUCTS AND SERVICES | CHEIN, ALLEN C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3627 | 1 |
| 3699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19193163 | MULTI-ENTITY PLATFORM USING UNIFORM LABELING OF DATA PRODUCTS AND SERVICES | CHEIN, ALLEN C | 3627 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 29, 2025 |
| 19045444 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR UNIFORM USAGE RIGHTS MANAGEMENT | ALI, JAHED | 3699 | §101 | Final Rejection | 15d overdue | Pending | Feb 04, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial