Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Veoneer US LLC

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Veoneer US LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This matter involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner for the company is SMALL, NAOMI J, who is assigned 1 pending office action. The data indicates a singular focus for the company's current patent prosecution, with the current case being the only active matter.

With only 1 pending office action, the entire active portfolio is concentrated under 1 distinct examiner. This lack of diversification across multiple examiners or art units means that the company's immediate progress in the Communications sector depends on the decisions of SMALL, NAOMI J. For a practitioner, this simplifies the management of the portfolio but increases the importance of the single pending case. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests the technology is being reviewed within a specific regulatory framework, requiring a strategy that is highly responsive to the specific examiner's feedback and the unit's standards.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SMALL, NAOMI J 1 63.9% +23.7%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18583703 AUTOMATED VEHICLE CHILD MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SMALL, NAOMI J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2685 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18583703 AUTOMATED VEHICLE CHILD MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS SMALL, NAOMI J 2685 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 21, 2024

Managing Veoneer US LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month