Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Verifast Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, yet they are both located within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that while the specific reviewers differ, the subject matter of the applications is closely related enough to be handled by the same specialized group. The focus on 1 distinct art unit may allow for a more unified approach to technical arguments across the 2 pending office actions.
The busiest examiner, BROWN, LUIS A, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 distinct examiners and each handles 1 pending office action, the workload is split evenly. This arrangement allows for a focused prosecution strategy within the art unit while dealing with the individual perspectives of the examiners. Practitioners should be prepared to address the specific preferences of each reviewer while maintaining a consistent technical narrative for the 2 pending office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN, LUIS A | 1 | 46.2% | +31.3% |
| MILEF, ELDA G | 1 | 41.1% | +8.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18969814 | SINGLE SIGN-ON VERIFICATION PLATFORM AND DECISION MATRIX | MILEF, ELDA G | 72d |
| 18969944 | SINGLE SIGN-ON VERIFICATION PLATFORM AND DECISION MATRIX | BROWN, LUIS A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18969944 | SINGLE SIGN-ON VERIFICATION PLATFORM AND DECISION MATRIX | BROWN, LUIS A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2113 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18969944 | SINGLE SIGN-ON VERIFICATION PLATFORM AND DECISION MATRIX | BROWN, LUIS A | 2113 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 05, 2024 |
| 18969814 | SINGLE SIGN-ON VERIFICATION PLATFORM AND DECISION MATRIX | MILEF, ELDA G | 2113 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 72d | Pending | Dec 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial