5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 3 (60%) |
| §103 only | 1 (20%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMITH, LINDSEY B | 1 | 51.7% | +54.5% |
| ANSARI, AZAM A | 1 | 47.6% | +49.6% |
| LE, MICHAEL | 1 | 65.9% | +22.1% |
| BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE | 1 | 23.1% | +27.6% |
| REFAI, SAM M | 1 | 34.5% | +7.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17393448 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USER GROUP DETERMINATION, CHURN IDENTIFICATION AND CONTENT SELECTION | BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE | 50d overdue |
| 17529486 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FRAUD IDENTIFICATION UTILIZING COMBINED METRICS | ANSARI, AZAM A | 12d |
| 17530631 | RELATED ITEM DETERMINATION AND CONTENT SELECTION BASED UPON RELATED ITEMS | SMITH, LINDSEY B | 28d |
| 17305688 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING ELECTRONIC CONTENT DELIVERY FOR NON-MEASURABLE USERS | REFAI, SAM M | 29d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17404219 | COMPARABLE ITEM IDENTIFICATION FOR QUERY ITEMS | LE, MICHAEL | 98d overdue |
| 17393448 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USER GROUP DETERMINATION, CHURN IDENTIFICATION AND CONTENT SELECTION | BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE | 50d overdue |
| 17529486 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FRAUD IDENTIFICATION UTILIZING COMBINED METRICS | ANSARI, AZAM A | 12d |
| 17530631 | RELATED ITEM DETERMINATION AND CONTENT SELECTION BASED UPON RELATED ITEMS | SMITH, LINDSEY B | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3621 | 2 |
| 3688 | 1 |
| 2163 | 1 |
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17530631 | RELATED ITEM DETERMINATION AND CONTENT SELECTION BASED UPON RELATED ITEMS | SMITH, LINDSEY B | 3688 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | Nov 19, 2021 |
| 17529486 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FRAUD IDENTIFICATION UTILIZING COMBINED METRICS | ANSARI, AZAM A | 3621 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | Nov 18, 2021 |
| 17404219 | COMPARABLE ITEM IDENTIFICATION FOR QUERY ITEMS | LE, MICHAEL | 2163 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 98d overdue | Pending | Aug 17, 2021 |
| 17393448 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USER GROUP DETERMINATION, CHURN IDENTIFICATION AND CONTENT SELECTION | BYRD, UCHE SOWANDE | 3624 | — | Non-Final OA | 50d overdue | Pending | Aug 04, 2021 |
| 17305688 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING ELECTRONIC CONTENT DELIVERY FOR NON-MEASURABLE USERS | REFAI, SAM M | 3621 | §101 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Jul 13, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial