Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

VIANAI SYSTEMS, INC.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications

8 pending office actions • 4 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

VIANAI SYSTEMS, INC. maintains a patent portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area with 8 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 8 distinct examiners, showing a broad engagement across the patent office. The portfolio spans 4 distinct art units, which suggests the company's software innovations cover multiple technical sub-domains within the computing field. This distribution requires a coordinated prosecution strategy to ensure consistency across different filings.

The busiest examiner for the company is WONG, LUT, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Given the total volume of 8 pending office actions, the workload is distributed across many individuals. This variety of 8 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units indicates that the company is receiving diverse perspectives from the patent office. For the practitioner, this necessitates a flexible approach to prosecution to navigate the specific tendencies of multiple examiners simultaneously.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other5 (62%)
§103 only2 (25%)
§102 only1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
38% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
4
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WONG, LUT 1 77.3% +14.1%
WU, BENJAMIN C 1 87.4% +16.4%
SHARPLESS, SAMUEL 1 81.4% +26.9%
BYCER, ERIC J 1 66.9% +42.4%
WU, NICHOLAS S 1 52.4% +31.4%
RAHMAN, IBRAHIM 1 11.1% +5.2%
GEBRESLASSIE, WINTA 1 77.1% +23.6%
XIA, XUYANG 1 72.5% +52.3%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18621619 TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING AND CORRECTING DATABASE QUERIES USING LANGUAGE MODELS SHARPLESS, SAMUEL 39d
18634580 TECHNIQUES FOR MIGRATING CLUSTER DATA WU, BENJAMIN C —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17960049 POSITIVITY VALIDATION AND EXPLAINABILITY FOR CAUSAL INFERENCE VIA ASYMMETRICALLY PRUNED DECISION TREES RAHMAN, IBRAHIM 89d overdue
17517505 DYNAMIC VARIABLE QUANTIZATION OF MACHINE LEARNING PARAMETERS XIA, XUYANG 70d
18651433 TECHNIQUES FOR MONITORING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PERFORMANCE WONG, LUT —
18621593 TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING AND CORRECTING LANGUAGE MODEL OUTPUTS BYCER, ERIC J —
18529635 TECHNIQUES FOR ACCELERATING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS WU, NICHOLAS S —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17831177 PERFORMING INFERENCE USING SIMPLIFIED REPRESENTATIONS OF CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS GEBRESLASSIE, WINTA 9d
18621619 TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING AND CORRECTING DATABASE QUERIES USING LANGUAGE MODELS SHARPLESS, SAMUEL 39d
17517505 DYNAMIC VARIABLE QUANTIZATION OF MACHINE LEARNING PARAMETERS XIA, XUYANG 70d
18651433 TECHNIQUES FOR MONITORING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PERFORMANCE WONG, LUT —
18634580 TECHNIQUES FOR MIGRATING CLUSTER DATA WU, BENJAMIN C —
18621593 TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING AND CORRECTING LANGUAGE MODEL OUTPUTS BYCER, ERIC J —
18529635 TECHNIQUES FOR ACCELERATING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS WU, NICHOLAS S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2165 1
2122 1
2677 1
2143 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18651433 TECHNIQUES FOR MONITORING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PERFORMANCE WONG, LUT — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 30, 2024
18634580 TECHNIQUES FOR MIGRATING CLUSTER DATA WU, BENJAMIN C — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 12, 2024
18621619 TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING AND CORRECTING DATABASE QUERIES USING LANGUAGE MODELS SHARPLESS, SAMUEL 2165 §102 Final Rejection 39d Pending Mar 29, 2024
18621593 TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING AND CORRECTING LANGUAGE MODEL OUTPUTS BYCER, ERIC J — §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 29, 2024
18529635 TECHNIQUES FOR ACCELERATING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS WU, NICHOLAS S — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2023
17960049 POSITIVITY VALIDATION AND EXPLAINABILITY FOR CAUSAL INFERENCE VIA ASYMMETRICALLY PRUNED DECISION TREES RAHMAN, IBRAHIM 2122 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 89d overdue Pending Oct 04, 2022
17831177 PERFORMING INFERENCE USING SIMPLIFIED REPRESENTATIONS OF CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS GEBRESLASSIE, WINTA 2677 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Jun 02, 2022
17517505 DYNAMIC VARIABLE QUANTIZATION OF MACHINE LEARNING PARAMETERS XIA, XUYANG 2143 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Nov 02, 2021

Managing VIANAI SYSTEMS, INC.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month