Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Vibraint Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Vibraint Inc. is currently active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area, with 2 pending office actions. This number of pending actions suggests a focused patent strategy or a portfolio in its early stages of development. For a company in the medical device sector, these actions represent critical hurdles in securing intellectual property rights for their mechanical innovations.

The prosecution of these matters is split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution means that each pending action is being evaluated in a different technical and administrative context. The lack of overlap between examiners and art units suggests that the company's technology may span different specialized niches within the broader mechanical engineering field.

FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN is the busiest examiner for Vibraint Inc., currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since the total number of pending office actions is 2, this examiner is responsible for a portion of the company's current workload at the patent office. Practitioners must manage different examiner relationships simultaneously to move the entire pending portfolio toward issuance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN 1 79.5% +18.2%
BERHANU, ETSUB D 1 65.1% +24.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18937916 NEUROREHABILITATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF NEUROREHABILITATION COMPRISING NEURALLY CONTROLLED STIMULATION FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN —
17439800 NEUROREHABILITATION SYSTEM AND NEUROREHABILITATION METHOD BERHANU, ETSUB D —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18937916 NEUROREHABILITATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF NEUROREHABILITATION COMPRISING NEURALLY CONTROLLED STIMULATION FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN —
17439800 NEUROREHABILITATION SYSTEM AND NEUROREHABILITATION METHOD BERHANU, ETSUB D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3792 1
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18937916 NEUROREHABILITATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF NEUROREHABILITATION COMPRISING NEURALLY CONTROLLED STIMULATION FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN 3792 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 05, 2024
17439800 NEUROREHABILITATION SYSTEM AND NEUROREHABILITATION METHOD BERHANU, ETSUB D 3791 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 15, 2021

Managing Vibraint Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Vibraint Inc. have?

Vibraint Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Vibraint Inc. applications?

Mallika Dipayan Fairchild has the most, with 1 of Vibraint Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Vibraint Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month