Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Vibrantz Minerals Limited holds a company patent portfolio that is currently facing 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action constitutes the entire active prosecution for the entity. The data shows 0 distinct art units, which suggests that the pending matter is not currently categorized across multiple technical divisions of the patent office.
The review is handled by 1 distinct examiner, concentrating the legal interaction into a single channel. This lack of examiner diversity means that the company's immediate patent prospects are tied to the findings of 1 individual. For the practitioner, the combination of 1 distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units simplifies the communication strategy but increases the importance of the relationship with the assigned official.
MILLER, CAMERON KENNETH is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending office action in total, MILLER, CAMERON KENNETH is the sole examiner for the current workload. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of MILLER, CAMERON KENNETH to resolve the 1 pending office action effectively, as there are no other art units or examiners to provide comparative benchmarks.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MILLER, CAMERON KENNETH | 1 | 81.5% | +0.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18723373 | Refractory Coating | MILLER, CAMERON KENNETH | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18723373 | Refractory Coating | MILLER, CAMERON KENNETH | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial