Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Victoria Holdco B V has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. Arti R Singh-Pandey is the busiest examiner, currently managing 1 pending office action. The portfolio's pending workload is split across different examiners and art units, suggesting a decentralized approach.
With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, each matter is receiving individual attention from a different examiner. The involvement of 2 distinct art units means that the company is engaging with two separate technical groups within the patent office. Arti R Singh-Pandey's 1 pending office action accounts for part of the company's current pending activity. This distribution across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units indicates that the pending applications in the Chemistry & Materials field are being evaluated independently.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SINGH-PANDEY, ARTI R | 1 | 70.5% | +9.2% |
| SWIER, WAYNE K. | 1 | 67.9% | +19.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18714797 | ARTIFICIAL TURF AND PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING ARTIFICIAL TURF | SWIER, WAYNE K. | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1759 | 1 |
| 1748 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18920119 | ARTIFICIAL TURF MONOFILAMENT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN ARTIFICIAL TURF MONOFILAMENT | SINGH-PANDEY, ARTI R | 1759 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 18, 2024 |
| 18714797 | ARTIFICIAL TURF AND PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING ARTIFICIAL TURF | SWIER, WAYNE K. | 1748 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | May 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialVictoria Holdco B V has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Arti R Singh-Pandey has the most, with 1 of Victoria Holdco B V's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
