Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Virtualz Computing Corporation currently has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These 2 pending office actions are distributed across 2 distinct art units, reflecting different technical aspects of the company's software innovations. The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners, one for each pending matter.
MCQUITERY, DIEDRA M is the busiest examiner, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. With 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units for only 2 pending office actions, the portfolio is entirely decentralized. Practitioners must prepare for two different examination environments within the Computing & Software sector, as each case is handled by a different individual.
The involvement of 2 distinct examiners means that the applicant must develop separate relationships with each examiner. Because the 2 pending office actions are also in 2 distinct art units, there is no departmental overlap to simplify the prosecution. Success in this portfolio depends on meeting the specific technical standards of each unit and the individual preferences of MCQUITERY, DIEDRA M and the other examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABAD, FARLEY J | 1 | 86.3% | +5.3% |
| MCQUITERY, DIEDRA M | 1 | 73.4% | +28.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19088536 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAINFRAME APPLICATION ACCESS TO DATA STORED IN A NON-MAINFRAME ENVIRONMENT | ABAD, FARLEY J | — |
| 19088345 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTIVE MIGRATION OF MAINFRAME RESOURCES TO A NON-MAINFRAME ENVIRONMENT | MCQUITERY, DIEDRA M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19088345 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTIVE MIGRATION OF MAINFRAME RESOURCES TO A NON-MAINFRAME ENVIRONMENT | MCQUITERY, DIEDRA M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2181 | 1 |
| 2166 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19088536 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MAINFRAME APPLICATION ACCESS TO DATA STORED IN A NON-MAINFRAME ENVIRONMENT | ABAD, FARLEY J | 2181 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 24, 2025 |
| 19088345 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTIVE MIGRATION OF MAINFRAME RESOURCES TO A NON-MAINFRAME ENVIRONMENT | MCQUITERY, DIEDRA M | 2166 | §101§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 24, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialVirtualz Computing Corporation has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Farley J Abad has the most, with 1 of Virtualz Computing Corporation's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
