Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days
Vito N V is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This specific matter is being handled within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated technical focus for the company's current patent activities. The presence of 1 distinct examiner suggests that the entirety of the company's active prosecution at this stage is subject to the discretion of a single official. This focus within Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics may simplify the monitoring of prosecution trends, as there are no competing examiner styles to reconcile.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is JEPPSON, PAMELA J, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending office action in total, this examiner's decisions will have a definitive impact on the current state of the portfolio. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner with 1 distinct art unit ensures that the legal strategy remains focused on the specific requirements of that unit. Practitioners should focus on the specific preferences of JEPPSON, PAMELA J, as this individual manages the company's 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOYLE, ROBERT C | 1 | 69.7% | -2.8% |
| POUDEL, SANTOSH RAJ | 1 | 76.5% | +32.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18692608 | DEGRADABLE CURING AGENTS, COMPOSITIONS AND CURABLE COMPOSITIONS THEREOF | BOYLE, ROBERT C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18028942 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS USING CLOUD SERVICES | POUDEL, SANTOSH RAJ | 14d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1764 | 1 |
| 2115 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18692608 | DEGRADABLE CURING AGENTS, COMPOSITIONS AND CURABLE COMPOSITIONS THEREOF | BOYLE, ROBERT C | 1764 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
| 18028942 | A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS USING CLOUD SERVICES | POUDEL, SANTOSH RAJ | 2115 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Mar 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialVito N.V. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Robert C Boyle has the most, with 1 of Vito N.V.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
