Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Vivipulse LLC is managing 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This activity is confined to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a narrow and specific focus for the company's current patent prosecution. Such a focused profile suggests that the technology being patented falls within a specific mechanical or medical sub-specialty. The use of a single art unit implies that the USPTO's review is concentrated within a specific technical classification.
The busiest examiner, AGAHI, PUYA, is currently handling 1 pending office action. This single examiner manages the company's entire pending portfolio at this time. With the workload limited to 1 art unit, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the interactions with this specific examiner. The data shows no current distribution of work across multiple examiners or technical divisions. For the practitioner, this means that the progress of the 1 pending office action is the sole focus of the current prosecution effort. The influence of AGAHI, PUYA is paramount, as this examiner is the only individual currently reviewing the company's pending intellectual property.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGAHI, PUYA | 1 | 49.2% | +24.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17234200 | Wearable Pulse Waveform Measurement System and Method | AGAHI, PUYA | 15d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17234200 | Wearable Pulse Waveform Measurement System and Method | AGAHI, PUYA | 15d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3791 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17234200 | Wearable Pulse Waveform Measurement System and Method | AGAHI, PUYA | 3791 | §101§103§112Other | Final Rejection | 15d overdue | Pending | Apr 19, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial