Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Voortman Steel Machinery Holding B V

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Voortman Steel Machinery Holding B V currently has 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. COLLINS, DANIEL S. is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action.

The portfolio's activity is diversified across 2 distinct art units, even with a small total of 2 pending office actions. This means that each pending matter is being handled by a different examiner in a different unit, as the busiest examiner only accounts for 1 pending office action. Such a spread can be beneficial for avoiding bottlenecks associated with 1 examiner's backlog, though it requires managing 2 different sets of examiner expectations simultaneously. Practitioners should note that with 2 distinct examiners involved, there is an opportunity to observe how different parts of the patent office respond to the company's technology. This diversification across 2 distinct art units provides a broader perspective on the patentability of the portfolio's mechanical innovations than a more concentrated filing strategy would allow. The balanced workload across 2 examiners suggests a stable prosecution environment for the company.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COLLINS, DANIEL S. 1 85.2% +9.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18218523 3D-CUTTER AND A METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE 3D-CUTTER COLLINS, DANIEL S. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3745 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18218523 3D-CUTTER AND A METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE 3D-CUTTER COLLINS, DANIEL S. 3745 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 05, 2023

Managing Voortman Steel Machinery Holding B V's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month