Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Voortman Steel Machinery Holding B V currently has 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. COLLINS, DANIEL S. is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action.
The portfolio's activity is diversified across 2 distinct art units, even with a small total of 2 pending office actions. This means that each pending matter is being handled by a different examiner in a different unit, as the busiest examiner only accounts for 1 pending office action. Such a spread can be beneficial for avoiding bottlenecks associated with 1 examiner's backlog, though it requires managing 2 different sets of examiner expectations simultaneously. Practitioners should note that with 2 distinct examiners involved, there is an opportunity to observe how different parts of the patent office respond to the company's technology. This diversification across 2 distinct art units provides a broader perspective on the patentability of the portfolio's mechanical innovations than a more concentrated filing strategy would allow. The balanced workload across 2 examiners suggests a stable prosecution environment for the company.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLLINS, DANIEL S. | 1 | 85.2% | +9.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18218523 | 3D-CUTTER AND A METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE 3D-CUTTER | COLLINS, DANIEL S. | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3745 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18218523 | 3D-CUTTER AND A METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE 3D-CUTTER | COLLINS, DANIEL S. | 3745 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 05, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial