Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Vortex Technology Group LLC

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Vortex Technology Group LLC maintains a company patent portfolio within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. Currently, the portfolio includes 1 pending office action. This workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner, LEARY, JOSHUA DENNIS, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending action. All prosecution activity is localized within 1 distinct art unit.

For a practitioner, this concentration means the company's current USPTO engagement is limited to a specific channel. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the active pipeline. Navigating the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field with 1 distinct examiner allows for a highly focused approach. However, it also means the portfolio's immediate growth depends on the resolution of the 1 busiest examiner pending action. Practitioners should tailor their strategy specifically to the tendencies of LEARY, JOSHUA DENNIS to optimize outcomes within the 1 distinct art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEARY, JOSHUA DENNIS 1 100.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18160133 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A HYDROPHILIC-COATED PIPE LINER LEARY, JOSHUA DENNIS 2d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3753 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18160133 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A HYDROPHILIC-COATED PIPE LINER LEARY, JOSHUA DENNIS 3753 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Jan 26, 2023

Managing Vortex Technology Group LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month