Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Vti Ventil Technik GmbH currently has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This company patent portfolio matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This structure indicates a narrow and focused area of prosecution for the current filings. The 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technical subject matter falls within a specific niche of mechanical engineering.
ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner, the progression of the 1 pending office action depends on his specific review. The 1 distinct art unit provides the context for this examination, and practitioners must tailor their strategies to the standards of this single unit. This profile shows a streamlined interaction with the USPTO, centered on 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC | 1 | 40.9% | +29.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722734 | TRIGGERING DEVICE FOR A FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM | ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC | 21d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722734 | TRIGGERING DEVICE FOR A FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM | ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC | 21d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3752 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18722734 | TRIGGERING DEVICE FOR A FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM | ONDREJCAK, ANDREW DOMENIC | 3752 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 21d | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial