Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Vydiant Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 2 actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners and are located within 2 distinct art units. This means that each of the company's current pending matters is being reviewed by a different individual in a different administrative unit. The busiest examiner, JACKSON, JORDAN L, is responsible for 1 pending action.
For a practitioner, this portfolio is completely decentralized despite its small size. There is no overlap between the 2 pending office actions in terms of examiners or art units. Each action must be prosecuted as an entirely independent matter within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field. The 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units ensure that the company's innovations are being evaluated from two different technical and procedural perspectives. Managing these 2 pending actions requires two separate strategies tailored to the specific requirements of the different officials and their respective units. This structure prevents the application of examiner-specific insights across the portfolio but provides a broader exposure to different examination styles within the semiconductor division.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JACKSON, JORDAN L | 1 | 40.8% | +38.5% |
| FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL | 1 | 19.4% | +23.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17705110 | PERSONALIZED HEALTH SYSTEM, METHOD AND DEVICE HAVING A GOALS FUNCTION | FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL | 2d overdue |
| 19193575 | DIGITAL VACCINE SYSTEM, METHOD AND DEVICE | JACKSON, JORDAN L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17705110 | PERSONALIZED HEALTH SYSTEM, METHOD AND DEVICE HAVING A GOALS FUNCTION | FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL | 2d overdue |
| 19193575 | DIGITAL VACCINE SYSTEM, METHOD AND DEVICE | JACKSON, JORDAN L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2857 | 1 |
| 3687 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19193575 | DIGITAL VACCINE SYSTEM, METHOD AND DEVICE | JACKSON, JORDAN L | 2857 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 29, 2025 |
| 17705110 | PERSONALIZED HEALTH SYSTEM, METHOD AND DEVICE HAVING A GOALS FUNCTION | FURTADO, WINSTON RAHUL | 3687 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 2d overdue | Pending | Mar 25, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial