Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
Väderstad Holding AB has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. COY, NICOLE A is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending action. This distribution means each pending case is being handled by a different examiner in a different unit, providing a balanced prosecution landscape.
The involvement of 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's mechanical innovations are being reviewed from multiple technical angles. For the practitioner, this requires managing two separate sets of examiner expectations and procedural requirements. COY, NICOLE A and the other involved examiner will each bring their own perspective to the 2 pending office actions. This structure ensures that the company's progress is not dependent on a single individual's decision. With 2 pending office actions in total, the company can maintain a focused yet diverse strategy that addresses the specific technical challenges presented in each of the 2 distinct art units within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COY, NICOLE A | 1 | 78.2% | -2.3% |
| HARP, WILLIAM RAY | 1 | 79.1% | +10.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18548643 | AN AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT, A COMPUTER PROGRAM, A COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN AIRFLOW IN A FEED SYSTEM FOR AN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT OF THE AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT | HARP, WILLIAM RAY | 30d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3672 | 1 |
| 3653 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18851917 | Agricultural Implements and Methods of Folding Agricultural Implements | COY, NICOLE A | 3672 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 27, 2024 |
| 18548643 | AN AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT, A COMPUTER PROGRAM, A COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM AND A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN AIRFLOW IN A FEED SYSTEM FOR AN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT OF THE AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT | HARP, WILLIAM RAY | 3653 | §103 | Final Rejection | 30d | Pending | Sep 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialVäderstad Holding AB has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Nicole A Coy has the most, with 1 of Väderstad Holding AB's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
