Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Wafios Aktiengesellschaft

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Wafios Aktiengesellschaft currently has 4 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 4 distinct examiners, which introduces multiple perspectives into the prosecution of the company's mechanical innovations. The involvement of 3 distinct art units further indicates that the pending applications are categorized into several different technical specialties within the medical device sector.

The workload is evenly split, with the busiest examiner, PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are a matching number of distinct examiners for the 4 pending office actions, each examiner is responsible for an equal portion of the current pending volume. The presence of 3 distinct art units requires the company to adapt its strategy to the specific guidelines of different examination groups while addressing the individual styles of the assigned examiners. This distribution suggests a diverse range of technical challenges for the pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK 1 59.1% +29.3%
YOO, JUN S 1 78.7% +20.1%
CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU 1 62.9% +24.9%
GUTHRIE, TERESA A 1 67.0% +36.2%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18030293 BENDING MACHINE, AND WIRE-PROCESSING SYSTEM INCLUDING A BENDING MACHINE GUTHRIE, TERESA A 26d
18705214 FEEDING SYSTEM PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK 56d
18435412 METHOD AND WIRE PROCESSING MACHINE THAT PRODUCES SHAPED PARTS FROM INSULATED FLAT MATERIAL YOO, JUN S —
18264905 METHOD AND WIRE PROCESSING MACHINE THAT PRODUCES SHAPED PARTS FROM INSULATED FLAT MATERIAL CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18030293 BENDING MACHINE, AND WIRE-PROCESSING SYSTEM INCLUDING A BENDING MACHINE GUTHRIE, TERESA A 26d
18705214 FEEDING SYSTEM PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK 56d
18435412 METHOD AND WIRE PROCESSING MACHINE THAT PRODUCES SHAPED PARTS FROM INSULATED FLAT MATERIAL YOO, JUN S —
18264905 METHOD AND WIRE PROCESSING MACHINE THAT PRODUCES SHAPED PARTS FROM INSULATED FLAT MATERIAL CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3725 2
3726 1
3729 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18705214 FEEDING SYSTEM PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK 3725 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 56d Pending Apr 26, 2024
18435412 METHOD AND WIRE PROCESSING MACHINE THAT PRODUCES SHAPED PARTS FROM INSULATED FLAT MATERIAL YOO, JUN S 3726 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 07, 2024
18264905 METHOD AND WIRE PROCESSING MACHINE THAT PRODUCES SHAPED PARTS FROM INSULATED FLAT MATERIAL CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU 3729 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 09, 2023
18030293 BENDING MACHINE, AND WIRE-PROCESSING SYSTEM INCLUDING A BENDING MACHINE GUTHRIE, TERESA A 3725 §103§112 Final Rejection 26d Pending Apr 05, 2023

Managing Wafios Aktiengesellschaft's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Wafios Aktiengesellschaft have?

Wafios Aktiengesellschaft has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Wafios Aktiengesellschaft applications?

Paul Derek Pressley has the most, with 1 of Wafios Aktiengesellschaft's pending office actions.

What technology area are Wafios Aktiengesellschaft's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month