Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Waga Energy

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Waga Energy currently has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. While there are 2 distinct examiners involved, all active prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. JOHN F PETTITT is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. This structure indicates that while the technical subject matter is consistent enough to remain within a single art unit, the USPTO has assigned the cases to different individuals for review, which may lead to different interpretive styles.

The use of 1 distinct art unit for 2 pending office actions suggests a consistent administrative environment. This allows the applicant to apply a unified understanding of art unit policies while tailoring specific technical arguments to the 2 distinct examiners. Since JOHN F PETTITT and the other examiner each handle 1 pending office action, the workload is evenly distributed. Practitioners should look for commonalities in the 2 pending office actions that might allow for shared research or consistent claim strategies. However, they must remain sensitive to the fact that 2 distinct examiners may reach different conclusions on similar technical points within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PETTITT, JOHN F 1 26.0% +21.8%
MENGESHA, WEBESHET 1 47.2% +12.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18210413 PROCESS FOR CRYOGENIC SEPARATION OF A FEED STREAM CONTAINING METHANE AND AIR GASES, FACILITY FOR PRODUCING BIOMETHANE BY PURIFICATION OF BIOGASES DERIVED FROM NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE FACILITIES (NHWSF) IMPLEMENTING THE PROCESS PETTITT, JOHN F 41d
18034717 FACILITY FOR PRODUCING GASEOUS METHANE BY PURIFYING BIOGAS FROM LANDFILL, COMBINING MEMBRANES AND CRYOGENIC DISTILLATION FOR LANDFILL BIOGAS UPGRADING MENGESHA, WEBESHET —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18210413 PROCESS FOR CRYOGENIC SEPARATION OF A FEED STREAM CONTAINING METHANE AND AIR GASES, FACILITY FOR PRODUCING BIOMETHANE BY PURIFICATION OF BIOGASES DERIVED FROM NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE FACILITIES (NHWSF) IMPLEMENTING THE PROCESS PETTITT, JOHN F 41d
18034717 FACILITY FOR PRODUCING GASEOUS METHANE BY PURIFYING BIOGAS FROM LANDFILL, COMBINING MEMBRANES AND CRYOGENIC DISTILLATION FOR LANDFILL BIOGAS UPGRADING MENGESHA, WEBESHET —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3763 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18210413 PROCESS FOR CRYOGENIC SEPARATION OF A FEED STREAM CONTAINING METHANE AND AIR GASES, FACILITY FOR PRODUCING BIOMETHANE BY PURIFICATION OF BIOGASES DERIVED FROM NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE FACILITIES (NHWSF) IMPLEMENTING THE PROCESS PETTITT, JOHN F 3763 §103§112 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Jun 15, 2023
18034717 FACILITY FOR PRODUCING GASEOUS METHANE BY PURIFYING BIOGAS FROM LANDFILL, COMBINING MEMBRANES AND CRYOGENIC DISTILLATION FOR LANDFILL BIOGAS UPGRADING MENGESHA, WEBESHET 3763 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 01, 2023

Managing Waga Energy's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month