Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Wahl GmbH

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Wahl GmbH has 3 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The portfolio is handled by 3 distinct examiners in 1 distinct art unit. LEE, LAURA MICHELLE is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter, so examiner assignments are separate within a common art-unit setting.

The common art unit supports a consistent review of mechanical and medical-device terminology, claim construction, and technical disclosure. Counsel should nevertheless prepare application-specific responses because the matters involve 3 distinct examiners. Shared analysis may help identify recurring art-unit concerns, while each amendment and argument must remain supported by the specification and responsive to its own cited record.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, LAURA MICHELLE 1 54.8% +31.1%
WATSON, HALEIGH NOELLE 1 34.5% +79.2%
KEENA, ELLA LORRAINE 1 13.0% +14.5%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18283924 ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR A HAIR-CUTTING APPLIANCE WATSON, HALEIGH NOELLE 93d overdue
18276126 BLADE SET FOR A HAIR CUTTING MACHINE KEENA, ELLA LORRAINE 44d overdue
18708013 HAIR-CUTTING DEVICE, CHARGER, AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERY LEE, LAURA MICHELLE 15d overdue

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18283924 ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR A HAIR-CUTTING APPLIANCE WATSON, HALEIGH NOELLE 93d overdue
18276126 BLADE SET FOR A HAIR CUTTING MACHINE KEENA, ELLA LORRAINE 44d overdue
18708013 HAIR-CUTTING DEVICE, CHARGER, AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERY LEE, LAURA MICHELLE 15d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3724 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18708013 HAIR-CUTTING DEVICE, CHARGER, AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERY LEE, LAURA MICHELLE 3724 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending May 07, 2024
18283924 ADJUSTMENT DEVICE FOR A HAIR-CUTTING APPLIANCE WATSON, HALEIGH NOELLE 3724 §103§112 Final Rejection 93d overdue Pending Apr 12, 2024
18276126 BLADE SET FOR A HAIR CUTTING MACHINE KEENA, ELLA LORRAINE 3724 §103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Aug 07, 2023

Managing Wahl GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Wahl GmbH have?

Wahl GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Wahl GmbH applications?

Laura Michelle Lee has the most, with 1 of Wahl GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Wahl GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month